|
Also Recommended
|
|
|
Henri Béjoint
£34.00
|
|
|
|
|
The Hidden Cultural Legacy of English
Anna Wierzbicka
£65.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paola Crisma, Giuseppe Longobardi
£74.00 £18.50
Please note, this offer price only applies to individual customers when ordering direct from Oxford University Press, while stock lasts. No further discounts will apply. If you are a bookseller, please contact your OUP sales representative.
|
|
|
|
|
Degrammaticalization
Muriel Norde
288 pages
|
Tables, Tree Diagrams
|
234x156mm
978-0-19-920792-3
|
Hardback
|
17 September 2009
|
|
|
|
|
- Original work, first monograph on degrammaticalization
- Essential contribution to current theorizing about grammaticalization and lexicalization
- Well-documented, using data from a wide variety of languages
- Clearly-written
Grammaticalization is a well-attested process of linguistic change in which a lexical item becomes a function word, which may be further reduced to a clitic or affix. Proponents of the universality of grammaticalization have usually argued that it is unidirectional and have thus found it a useful tool in linguistic reconstruction. In this book Prof Norde shows that change is reversible on all levels: semantic, morphological, syntactic, and phonological. As a consequence, the alleged unidirectionality of grammaticalization is not a reliable reconstructional tool, even if degrammaticalization is a rare phenomenon.
Degrammaticalization, she argues, is essentially different from
grammaticalization: it usually comprises a single change, examples being shifts from affix to clitic, or from function word to lexical item. And where grammaticalization can be seen as a process, degrammaticalization is often the by-product of other changes. Nevertheless, she shows that it can be described, like grammaticalization, in a principled way, in order to establish whether a change in a word has been from more to less grammatical or vice versa, and the stages by which it has become so. Using data from different languages she constructs a typology of degrammaticalization changes. She explains why degrammaticalization is so rare and why some linguists have such strongly negative feelings about the possibility of its existence. She adds to the understanding of grammaticalization and
makes a significant contribution to methods of linguistic reconstruction and the study of language change. She writes clearly, aiming to be understood by advanced undergraduate students as well as appealing to scholars and graduate researchers in historical linguistics.Readership: Historical linguists at advanced undergraduate level and above.
|
|
|
Muriel Norde, University of Groningen
|
|
|
1.: Introduction
2: Unidirectionality
3: Defining Degrammaticalization
4: Degrammation
5: Deinflectionalization
6: Debonding
7: Conclusions
References
Index of names
Index of Subjects
|
|
|
|
Recently Viewed
|
|
|
William Shakespeare, Stanley Wells...
£16.99
|
|
|
|
|
Lori Lach, Catherine Parr...
£80.00
|
|
|
|
|
Processes, Models, and Applications
Herman A. Verhoef, Peter J. Morin
£34.95
|
|
|
|
|
The specification in this catalogue, including without limitation price, format, extent, number of illustrations, and month of publication, was as accurate as possible at the time the catalogue was compiled. Occasionally, due to the nature of some contractual restrictions, we are unable to ship a specific product to a particular territory. Jacket images are provisional and liable to change before publication.
|
|
