Readership: Scholars and advanced students of law and psychology.
Edited by Belinda Brooks-Gordon, Lecturer in Psychology, Birkbeck College, London, and Michael Freeman, Professor of English Law, University College London
1: Belinda Brooks-Gordon and Michael Freeman: Law And Psychology: Issues for Today 2: Jenny McEwan: Breaking Down the Barriers 3: Bruce J. Winick: Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Enhancing the Relationship Between Law and Psychology 4: Mandeep K. Dhami: Legal Decision Making: Psychological Reality Meets Legal Idealism 5: Oliver R. Goodenough: Can Cognitive Neuroscience Make Psychology a Foundational Discipline for the Study of Law? 6: Paul H. Robinson: How Psychology is Changing The Punishment Theory Debate 7: Paul Dougan, Fernand Gobet and Michael King: Modelling Systematic Communication Differences Between Law and Science 8: Jeffrey J. Rachlinski: Cognitive Errors, Individual Differences, and Paternalism 9: Michael E. Lamb and Anneli S. Larsson: Developmentally Appropriate Interview Techniques 10: Sarah Henderson and Linda Taylor: Nothing But The Truth: Achieving Best Evidence Through Interviewing in the Forensic Setting 11: Aldert Vrij and Samantha Mann: Lie Detection Assessments as Evidence in Criminal Courts 12: Andrew Roberts: Towards a Broader Perspective on the Problem of Mistaken Identification: Police Decision-Making And Identification Procedures. 13: Helen L. Westcott: Child Witness Testimony: What Do We Know And Where Are We Going? 14: Nicholas Bala and Katherine Duvall Antonacopoulos: The Controversy over Psychological Evidence in Family Law Cases 15: Elizabeth Gilchrist: Domestic Violence and Child Protection: Can Psychology Inform Legal Decisions? 16: Cynthia Willis Esqueda and Melissa Tehee: Legal and Psychological Approaches to Understanding Domestic Violence for American Indian Women 17: Lizzie Barmes: Worlds Colliding: Legal Regulation And Psychologists' Evidence about Workplace Bullying 18: Peter Bartlett: Psychology, Law and Murders of Gay Men: Responding to Homosexual Advances 19: Neil Vidmar: Trial By Jury Involving Persons Accused of Terrorism or Supporting Terrorism 20: Judith Fordham: Muddying the Waters with Red Herrings: Jurors, Juries and Expert Evidence 21: Julia Fionda, Robert Jago and Rachel Manning: Conflicts over Territory: Anti-Social Behaviour Legislation and Young People 22: Michael King and Diane King: Psychology as Reconstituted by Education and Law; The Case of Children with Autism 23: Ya'ir Ronen: The Construction of Memory Through Law and Law's Responsiveness to Children 24: Robert Mason and Safaa Amer: A Dual Process that Disables the Persuasive Impact of Mass Media Appeals to Obey Tax Laws 25: Susan Block-Lieb and Ted Janger: Consumer Bankruptcy Reform and the Heuristic Borrower 26: Helen Self: Regulating Prostitution 27: Stephen Frosh: Psychoanalysis and the Nazis
