Revenge of the Liar

• One of the hottest topics in logic and philosophy of language
• Fourteen previously unpublished papers
• Excellent line up of contributors

Readership: Scholars and advanced students of philosophy and logic.

Edited by JC Beall, University of Connecticut; University of St Andrews

"Revenge of the Liar should be a welcome addition to the libraries of everyone doing serious work on the paradoxes and in the philosophy of logic and language in general." - Alex Steinberg, Philosophy

JC BEALL: Prolegomenon to future revenge
1: ROY T. COOK: Embracing revenge: on the indefinite extendibility of language
2: MATTI EKLUND: The liar paradox, expressibility, and possible languages
3: HARTRY FIELD: Solving the paradoxes, escaping revenge
4: THOMAS HOFWEBER: Validity, paradox, and the ideal of deductive logic
5: HANNES LEITGEB: On the metatheory of Field's `Solving the paradoxes, escaping revenge'
6: TIM MAUDLIN: Reducing revenge to discomfort
7: DOUGLAS PATTERSON: Understanding the liar
8: GRAHAM PRIEST: Revenge, Field, and ZF
9: AGUSTIN RAYO and PHILIP WELCH: Field on revenge
10: STEPHEN READ: Bradwardine's revenge
11: GREG RESTALL: Curry's revenge: the costs of non-classical solutions to the paradoxes of self-reference
12: KEVIN SCHARP: Aletheic vengeance
13: STEWART SHAPIRO: Burali-Forti's revenge
14: KEITH SIMMONS: Revenge and context