|
|
|
|
The Making of International Law
Alan Boyle and Christine Chinkin
368 pages
|
234x156mm
978-0-19-924819-3
|
Hardback
|
22 February 2007
|
|
This item is temporarily unavailable. Orders for unavailable items are supplied and charged as soon as the item becomes available.
|
|
|
- Examines a wide range of traditional and new law-making processes, providing an insight into the sources of international law
- Blends empirical research and theoretical analysis
- Analyses topical issues like the legitimacy of law created by supranational bodies such as the UN, NGOs, and diplomatic conferences
This is a study of the principal negotiating processes and law-making tools through which contemporary international law is made. It does not seek to give an account of the traditional - and untraditional - sources and theories of international law, but rather to identify the processes, participants and instruments employed in the making of international law. It accordingly examines some of the mechanisms and procedures whereby new rules of law are created or old rules are amended or abrogated. It concentrates on the UN, other international organisations, diplomatic conferences,
codification bodies, NGOs, and courts.
Every society perceives the need to differentiate between its legal norms and other norms controlling social, economic and political behaviour. But unlike domestic legal systems where this distinction is typically determined by constitutional provisions, the decentralised nature of the international legal system makes this a complex and contested issue. Moreover, contemporary international law is often the product of a subtle and evolving interplay of law-making instruments, both binding and non-binding, and of customary law and general principles. Only in this broader context can the significance of so-called 'soft law' and multilateral treaties be fully appreciated.
An important question posed by any
examination of international law-making structures is the extent to which we can or should make judgments about their legitimacy and coherence, and if so in what terms. Put simply, a law-making process perceived to be illegitimate or incoherent is more likely to be an ineffective process. From this perspective, the assumption of law-making power by the UN Security Council offers unique advantages of speed and universality, but it also poses a particular challenge to the development of a more open and participatory process observable in other international law-making bodies. Readership: Scholars, and advanced students of international law, and international relations; International law practitioners; Foreign
ministries; international governmental organisations and non-governmental organisations.
|
|
|
Alan Boyle, Professor of Public International Law, University of Edinburgh, and Christine Chinkin, Professor of International Law, LSE; Overseas Affiliated Faculty Member, University of Michigan
|
|
|
1: Introduction
2: Participants in International Law-making
3: Multilateral Law-making Processes
4: Codification and Progressive Development of International law
5: Law-making Instruments
6: The Role of Courts
|
|
|
|
Recently Viewed
|
|
|
Nationalism, Colonialism, and the Past
Margarita Diaz-Andreu
£82.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Search Approach
Theresa J. Devine, Nicolas M. Kiefer
£49.00
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Maskell, Ann Millar
£55.00
|
|
|
|
|
The specification in this catalogue, including without limitation price, format, extent, number of illustrations, and month of publication, was as accurate as possible at the time the catalogue was compiled. Occasionally, due to the nature of some contractual restrictions, we are unable to ship a specific product to a particular territory. Jacket images are provisional and liable to change before publication.
|
|
